Hi,

shouldn't it be the other way around? Try to integrate it better with GEM5?
If McPAT is not ideal, then maybe some other power/energy estimator in its
place?

Best regards,
Andreas

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would suggest we remove McPat as it is outdated and simply sitting there
> without any connection to gem5.
>
> Andreas
>
> From: gem5-users <[email protected]> on behalf of "Moussa,
> Ayman" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 at 15:36
> To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Subject: [gem5-users] McPat in ext folder
>
> I noticed that there McPat was in the ext folder and I ran the make file
> but when I tried to run McPat with one of the default xml files but it just
> segementation faults. Is it broken ?
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to