If you're executing instructions starting from the beginning of the
applications and the papers you're referring to are executing from
some more representative point in the middle (e.g., using SimPoints),
then that's a possible explanation for the difference.

Steve

2008/5/30 laymanyang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi, all
>
>    I am using M5 2.0.5 in SE mode to do cache bahavior simulation.
>    First, I excute gzip for 0.7 billion in a single core, and its L2 cache
> miss rate is 46.2%, cpi is 2.166.
>    Then I construct a two core system with private L1 cache and shared L2
> cache. L1 and L2 cache's parameters are not changed compared with single
> core.  I execute gzip and art in this two core system, and each benchmark
> is bound to a core. The parameter max_insts_any_thread is set to 0.7
> billion. Then, the gzip's miss rate in L2 cache is changed to 59.5% with
> only 13.3%
> decrease, and cpi is changed to 2.615.
>
>    But in many papers, gzip's L2 cache miss number is increased 9X when it
> is excuted with art, and ipc could also change 60%.
>
>    Is it the reason that executed instruction number is too small, or the
> problem of M5 configuration?
>    My L1 icache and dcache is 2-way associative and 8kB, and shared L2 cache
> is 16-way associative and 512kB. The detailed configuration is listed in
> accessory.
>
>    By the way, the L2 cache miss rate distinction of gzip when L2 size
>  changed in 2.0.4 is very tinny. L2 cache miss rate for gzip is 63% with
>  1MB L2, and is 64.5% with 512kB L2. But the distinction is more obvious
> in 2.0.5.
>    So I think may be the simulation of cache part in M5 has some problem.
>
>    Could anyone tell me why? or any possible reasons?
>
>    Thanks a lot!
>
>    Jason
>
>
> ________________________________
> 眼睛干涩?润洁一下!清凉配方,多重营养,缓解眼疲劳
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to