I'm going to assume everyone knows about gen-art. No objection. I don't see anything wrong with the listed requirements, modulo the one question below -- in fact they seem to be pretty good. However, I really can't tell if there are requirements that have been omitted, since I'm not in the area.
> Any application layer label mechanisms used to support ETS MUST be > capable of supporting both the set of ETS and non-ETS (presumably, > normal) users. I'm not sure about this one, perhaps because I don't understand what it means. I can envision, for example, applications that are only used in ETS situations, and are only capable of running with ETS labels. Are they disallowed? No special apps? I can see a requirement that any application which is used during normal times must still be usable during "medium emergencies". Is that the goal? Also a nit in case there is another version ... > If proxies take such action, then the security measures discussed in > [rfc3689] MUST be considered. More discussion about security in the > single domain context is discussed in section 5. You don't mean to say that the discussion is discussed. :-) swb _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
