Sorry, this was a review of draft-ietf-ieprep-domain-req-05.txt. I forgot to change the subject line.
> I'm going to assume everyone knows about gen-art. > > No objection. I don't see anything wrong with the listed > requirements, modulo the one question below -- in fact they seem to be > pretty good. However, I really can't tell if there are requirements > that have been omitted, since I'm not in the area. > > > Any application layer label mechanisms used to support ETS MUST be > > capable of supporting both the set of ETS and non-ETS (presumably, > > normal) users. > > I'm not sure about this one, perhaps because I don't understand what > it means. I can envision, for example, applications that are only > used in ETS situations, and are only capable of running with ETS > labels. Are they disallowed? No special apps? > > I can see a requirement that any application which is used during > normal times must still be usable during "medium emergencies". Is > that the goal? > > > Also a nit in case there is another version ... > > > If proxies take such action, then the security measures discussed in > > [rfc3689] MUST be considered. More discussion about security in the > > single domain context is discussed in section 5. > > You don't mean to say that the discussion is discussed. :-) > > swb _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
