The I-D deadline prevented that, so I've asked the IESG to
review the -01 since the topic is, er, topical. However,
I'm holding a DISCUSS so that it will certainly not be
approved next week.
Brian
Elwyn Davies wrote:
Regarding draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01:
I have reviewed -01 for LC. Sam and I have exchanged mails on this and
I understood he was going to create a new version, which I assumed would
be going to the IESG.
Regards,
Elwyn
Mary Barnes wrote:
Here's the assignments for the March 16th, 2006 telechat:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/reviewers-060316.html
with the corresponding spreadsheets available at:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html
Let me know any if you see any errors or omissions. It is a very heavy
load again, as we've got more folks with limited availability. Although,
keeping up with the LC reviews does remove some of the burden.
Mary.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
