[Replying to self to avoid contaminating the actual review...]
This is a document with less than 15 pages of content.
It has two editors on the front.
And 13 co-authors listed in the body?
Sometimes I wonder about what we are doing....
Joel
At 02:40 PM 3/10/2006, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
Nit, probably suitable for RFC Editor fixup:
In section 7.2 it says "information field with bit/byte stuffing,
frame relay header removed, and FCS removed ."
I am quite certain that the intention is to remove any bit/byte
stuffing. I would suggest:
"information field with the following components removed:
bit/byte stuffing, frame relay header, and FCS."
----
INT Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Frame Relay Over MPLS
Networks (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-frame-relay-07.txt>draft-ietf-pwe3-frame-relay-07.txt
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot&ballot_id=1935&filename=draft-ietf-pwe3-frame-relay>[Open
Web Ballot]
Token: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Mark Townsley
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
