Sharon Chisholm wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for:
draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-05.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
should be fixed before publication.
1. I still find the use of quotation marks within this document awkward
and distracting, but think there has been improvement in using double
quotes for quoted strings and single quotes for terms. I think though
that losing the quotes altogether for terms would be a bigger
improvement.
I don't have strong opinion on this. Can we do this via an RFC editor note?
2. After my last review, there was agreement to add an element of
procedure to the document along the lines of
I frankly don't remember this agreement. Both replies (from Ken and
myself) indicated that we don't believe that any changes are needed.
I will forward you my reply (which includes Ken's reply).
- Perform implementation/mail-system specific method of parsing out user
and detail from local address
- Use these two values to evaluate the statements defined in the sieve
language, including this subaddressing extension
I was asked where it should go, but did not respond (too much email). It
appears that the text was not added anywhere?
No text was added, because you didn't propose any specific text (or
place where it should be added).
Can you suggest any specific text?
Cheers,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
