Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
1. I still find the use of quotation marks within this document awkward
and distracting, but think there has been improvement in using double
quotes for quoted strings and single quotes for terms. I think though
that losing the quotes altogether for terms would be a bigger
improvement.
I don't have strong opinion on this. Can we do this via an RFC editor
note?
I regard this as something to be resolved between the authors
and the Editor, since it's essentially stylistic (and in another
universe would be solved by using italics).
Exactly.
...
- Perform implementation/mail-system specific method of parsing out
user
and detail from local address
- Use these two values to evaluate the statements defined in the sieve
language, including this subaddressing extension
I was asked where it should go, but did not respond (too much
email). It
appears that the text was not added anywhere?
No text was added, because you didn't propose any specific text (or
place where it should be added).
Can you suggest any specific text?
I will suggest in the tracker adding something like this
at the end of the Introduction:
Note that parsing the addressee of an incoming message
into 'user' and 'detail' parts is a local matter not specified
in this document.
That works for me. Ken?
Sure.
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
