I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Summary: I have not yet completed review of this document because it is rather long. However, I do have a couple of early comments: 1) The automated nit-detector complains that your references are unused. You can fix this by using the symbol [] around the reference. 2) The document claims to be version 12, but the page footers say version 11. 3) In Section 3, you spend lots of time defining common data types (eg, unsigned 8-bit integer). I assume that in the future, other people will write information models and those models will want to use the same data types. Shouldn't those type definitions be abstracted into a separate document? 4) Same comment holds for naming conventions in 2.3. more comments to come.... _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
