I have no further comments on this document.
-ron
Ron Bonica wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
> telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
>
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
> posting a new version of the draft.
>
> Summary: I have not yet completed review of this document because it is
> rather long. However, I do have a couple of early comments:
>
> 1) The automated nit-detector complains that your references are unused.
> You can fix this by using the symbol [] around the reference.
>
> 2) The document claims to be version 12, but the page footers say
> version 11.
>
> 3) In Section 3, you spend lots of time defining common data types (eg,
> unsigned 8-bit integer). I assume that in the future, other people will
> write information models and those models will want to use the same data
> types. Shouldn't those type definitions be abstracted into a separate
> document?
>
> 4) Same comment holds for naming conventions in 2.3.
>
> more comments to come....
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
