I hadn't realized that this text was also boilerplate - it's clearly ok to use the text as-is.
Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt > ... > > My one concern is that the security considerations section > > seems to be overly triumphant in declaring that "this > > document has no impact on the security of the Internet." > > I would weaken that to "no significant impact" and complement > > it with a sentence calling the reader's attention to the > > requirements and guidance in Section 3.4 of RFC 4181 on > > Security Considerations sections in MIB module specifications. > > The draft contains the standard text that the MIB Doctors recommend > for such MIB modules. See http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-security.html > right at the end. I think the authors ought to be let off the hook > on this one ... if the recommended text is problematic then the > issue probably should be taken up with the MIB Doctors. > > Thanks, > > Mike Heard _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
