Hi, Thanks for the review. I am OK with the comments (although if I am not mistaken I have seen some RFCs where it is used).
I have not received any additional comments for the last call, so how should I handle the draft for these comments? should I submit a new draft? Best regards, Lior -----Original Message----- From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 16:17 To: Lior Khermosh Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.txt Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Review Date: 26 October 2006 IETF LC Date: 19 October 2006 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC. Comments: Acronyms should also be expanded in the title of the draft. Generally, abstracts should not have references so that they could be distributed independently of the main document. The author may want to consider removing all references from the abstract. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
