Lior, Please wait. The IETF LC expires on 11/2. At that time we shall make a decision of the extent and nature of the comments require a new I-D.
Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Lior Khermosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:33 PM > To: Gonzalo Camarillo > Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]; Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Subject: RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.txt > > Hi, > Thanks for the review. > > I am OK with the comments (although if I am not mistaken I > have seen some RFCs where it is used). > > I have not received any additional comments for the last > call, so how should I handle the draft for these comments? > should I submit a new draft? > > Best regards, > Lior > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 16:17 > To: Lior Khermosh > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.txt > > Hi, > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team > (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, > please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call > comments you may receive. > > > Draft: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib-05.txt > Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Review Date: 26 October 2006 IETF LC Date: 19 October 2006 > > > Summary: > > This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC. > > > Comments: > > Acronyms should also be expanded in the title of the draft. > > Generally, abstracts should not have references so that they > could be distributed independently of the main document. The > author may want to consider removing all references from the abstract. > > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
