I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-framework-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2006-11-26 IETF LC End Date: 2006-11-28 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Comments: almost all the comments are about wording... -First comment is an exception, it is technical: 4.4 page 11 doesn't metion that ROHC has the capability to work without a feedback channel, i.e., on simplex/one-way links. As it is both an unique and important in some cases capability IMHO it should be mentioned somewhere... -The second exception is the TCP profile in 6 page 32 which is not yet an RFC, so the RFC editor could have to wait for it and update the document (it is not an issue but RFC editor should be warned). -There are many cases of "i.e." and "e.g." not folloed by a comma, 2.2 page 5 (2), 3.1 page 7, 4.4 pagee 11 (3), 12 (4), 4.6 page 13, 5 page 13, 5.2.5 page 235.3.1.4 page 26, 6 page 30. -In 2.1 page 4 (NACK): Acknowledgement -> Acknowledgment -There is a spurious ";" after "fields" at the beginning of 3.1 page 7. -In 3.2 page 7: acknowledgements -> acknowledgments -In 4.3 page 10: "extendable" is not a valid English word? -In 4.3 page 10, "feeback from implementers have also" -> has? -In 4.4 page 11 there are two "make it possible" which IMHO should be "make possible". -In 4.4 at the top of page 12: their definition assume -> definitions. -In 4.5 page 12: and it then -> and then. -In 5.1.1 page 14: one another need not even have CID spaces -> to have CID space -In 5.2.4.1 last line of page 21: acknowledgement -> acknowledgment. -In 6 page 30: fields, or ... types, updates -> update (without the comma?) Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: of course everything can (i.e., should) be fixed at AUTH48 or by the RFC editor itself! _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
