> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 4:34 AM > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hollenbeck, Scott > Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-05 > > Gen-ART review of draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3733bis-05
[snip] > 1) The document is not quite consistent on whether the XML document > MUST use UTF-8 encoding, or whether other encodings are allowed (and > UTF-8 is just the recommended encoding). The author indicated > that "MUST use UTF-8" is the right interpretation, but there's > some text that needs to be fixed to take this into account. I believe that Ted has already entered an appropriate RFC Editor note for this. > 2) The reference to E.164 is still not quite right: the current > title/date refer are of E.164.1, while the right document to cite > here would be (AFAIK) E.164. Its title would be "The international > public telecommunication numbering plan" and date 02/2005. I don't know what I was looking at when I did -05, but I'd swear it was an ITU page that said that the 02/05 version was superceded by the version I used. Looking again, though, I see that Pasi is correct: http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-E.164/en The correct reference should read like this: [ITU.E164.2005] International Telephone and Telegraph Consultative Committee, "The international public telecommunication numbering plan", ITU Recommendation E.164, February 2005. The citations should change from "[ITU.E164.2006]" to "[ITU.E164.2005]". -Scott- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
