I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described
in the review. These need to be fixed before the document moves forward.
Comments:
Substantial
===========
* The IANA considerations is incredibly vague. It does not specify what
registry the draft is seeking allocation out of. Also the draft can only
specify suggested values. It cannot mandate IANA to assign specific values.
"The authors have chosen "1" as the type code of the 32-bits
Administrative Tag Sub-TLV and "2" as the type code of the 64-bits
Administrative Tag Sub-TLV. These values must be allocated by IANA."
* The example IP addresses used in the document do not come from the
RFC3330 Test-net block (i.e. 192.0.2.0/24)
Minor
=====
* The IPR boilerplate is a mix of boilerplate from RFC2026 and RFC3668.
This needs to be switched to a consistent boilerplate (RFC3978 perhaps)
* Unused references [1],[4].
* Downrefs to Informational RFCs [3],[5]
* Newer version of draft-ietf-isis-ipv6 available
Editorial
=========
* Lots of long lines and pages
* Whole lot of nits in the document. Please run a nits checker
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
