Ok, after conferring with Carl: We will remove both unused references. (reasons: The references are not so important and when LTAP will become RFC later, it will reference the ERS RFC.)
Tobias > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 8:38 PM > To: Tobias Gondrom; Brian E Carpenter; General Area Review Team > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tim Polk; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ltans-ers-13.txt > > The RFC editor does not allow documents to be listed as references > that are not referred to in the text. > > Russ > > At 02:01 PM 5/21/2007, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > > > Editorial: > > > ---------- > > > > > > == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-ltans-ltap' is defined on line 1117, > >but no > > > explicit reference was found in the text > > > > > > == Unused Reference: 'RFC3029' is defined on line 1144, but no > >explicit > > > reference was found in the text > > > > > >[tg]: We thought we should leave them in as Informational references as > >they provide information about the context of the draft. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
