I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mip6-experimental-messages-01.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2007-09-04 IETF LC End Date: 2007-09-12 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Comments: some editorial questions: - in abstract page 1: s/header/Header/ BTW as MH is the common abbrev Mobility Header should always get the 'H'. This is not clear for Mobility Option but a choice has to be done and applied... - ToC and section 7: s/Acknowledgements/Acknowledgments/ - section 1 page 3: s/Proxy MIPv6/Proxy Mobile IPv6/ - the figure in page 3 seems a bit strange because some important and decribed fields are not in it. I believe it is directly from RFC 3775 section 6.1 "Mobility Header" which gives only the content of messages, so IMHO this section needs an explicit reference to RFC 3775 6.1. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
