Hi Francis, Thanks for the review.
Francis Dupont wrote:
Comments: some editorial questions: - in abstract page 1: s/header/Header/ BTW as MH is the common abbrev Mobility Header should always get the 'H'. This is not clear for Mobility Option but a choice has to be done and applied...
Fixed.
- ToC and section 7: s/Acknowledgements/Acknowledgments/
Why? Both are valid. FWIW, RFC 3775 uses "Acknowledgement". :)
- section 1 page 3: s/Proxy MIPv6/Proxy Mobile IPv6/
Ok.
- the figure in page 3 seems a bit strange because some important and decribed fields are not in it. I believe it is directly from RFC 3775 section 6.1 "Mobility Header" which gives only the content of messages, so IMHO this section needs an explicit reference to RFC 3775 6.1.
Added a sentence in section 3. The fields described in the message format below follow the Mobility Header fields as defined in Section 6.1 of RFC 3775 [2]. Vijay _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
