Christain,

Sorry for the late reply.  I will address your concern
regarding acronyms.

Regards,

Ken 

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:52 AM
To: Gen-ART Mailing List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Morneault (kmorneau);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01
Reviewer:  Christian Vogt
Review Date:  Oct 25, 2007

Summary:  Almost ready.

Comments:

This document updates RFC 4233 ("Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) Q.921-User Adaptation Layer").  It changes a message type code to
resolve a type code collision.

I think this document is almost ready for publication.  The only change
I would suggest is to spell out the many acronyms used across the
document.  Should be a few simple find-and-replace operations.

Best regards,
- Christian


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to