Hi Ken, Hi Jon,
should I do this in the .xml sources or do you want to do it? I
can send you the sources. There is also one change requested from
Jon.
Jon should we resubmit the ID with the changes included or wait
for more comments?
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Ken Morneault (kmorneau) wrote:
Christain,
Sorry for the late reply. I will address your concern
regarding acronyms.
Regards,
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:52 AM
To: Gen-ART Mailing List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Morneault (kmorneau);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART,
please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01
Reviewer: Christian Vogt
Review Date: Oct 25, 2007
Summary: Almost ready.
Comments:
This document updates RFC 4233 ("Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) Q.921-User Adaptation Layer"). It changes a message type
code to
resolve a type code collision.
I think this document is almost ready for publication. The only
change
I would suggest is to spell out the many acronyms used across the
document. Should be a few simple find-and-replace operations.
Best regards,
- Christian
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
