I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-mapping-arch-03.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2007-11-22
IETF LC End Date: 2007-11-29
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: Almost ready, with concerns

Comments: 

If deployed, this would become critical infrastructure for emergency
response and for disaster handling. I'm quite concerned about moving it
immediately to Proposed Standard, which would amount to the IETF asserting
that it's nearly ready for that critical role. It feels to me very much
like something that should be the subject of a serious experimental
deployment first. I know we disclaim warranty of "FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR 
PURPOSE" but this is about sending ambulances to the wrong address,
or not knowing where to send them after an explosion.

I needed to look at draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-06.txt while reviewing the present 
draft. Since I carry scars from IESG discussion of 
draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil 
(now RFC 4676) I looked for references to that work. I'm puzzled that RFC 4676,
LoST and draft-ietf-enum-validation-token seem to take different approaches
to civic/civil location specifications. This seems like storing up trouble.
In any case it seems like an architectural issue that should be mentioned in
the current draft.

While the architecture certainly includes provision for resilience
(basically caching, and redundancy within clusters) I would have wanted
to see a discussion of resilience when large parts of the Internet
infrastructure in a geographic region are destroyed. Are redundant copies
of the information held in other geographic regions? What is the minimal
amount of connectivity that's needed to access such out-of-region
copies? What dependencies are there (DNS, routing, etc.)? In other words,
will LoST be part of the disaster or part of the recovery?



_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to