On 2008-02-21 13:02, Russ Housley wrote: > Brian: > > You provided a very strong review. The response seems to be to go > forward as Informational instead of Proposed Standard (you advocated > Experimental). Does this seem like an acceptable direction to you? If > not, who not?
Well, that implies that at least some people agree with my concerns. It would be well within the IESG's rights to tell me I'm worried about nothing. But assuming people do share my concerns, I think publishing this off the standards track is entirely reasonable - it's thoughtful work, and with experience could be tightened up into normative material. Looking at non-ION http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/info-exp.html makes me wonder why Guideline 3 applies instead of Guideline 4 (which would make it Experimental) but that is certainly not my decision. Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
