Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > thanks for the comments. Answers inline:
Gonzalo: Picking up the threads of this review (my sincere apologies for not getting back to you earlier)... For the record, all of my comments have been addressed, so I have no additional ones. One remaining feedback from you was: vkg> - S5.10, third and fourth paragraphs: I think you need to make it vkg> more explicit that when using registrations as a mechanism to vkg> inject a recipient URI into a relay, the only way to do so is vkg> through 3rd-party registrations. Thus, we have to ensure that vkg> 3rd party registrations are valid through the return routability vkg> gyrations shown in Figure 7 (i.e., sending a MESSAGE to the vkg> URI in the Contact header of an incoming REGISTER, etc.) If you vkg> don't make explain the reason for this 3rd-party registration step vkg> in some detail, the nuances on why this is done is perhaps lost vkg> on the reader. gonzalo> gonzalo> Could you propose text to make it more explicit? I have read gonzalo> so many times this draft that it looks perfectly explicit gonzalo> to me :o) That is fair. I do note that IESG just approved consent-framework-04; so any further changes will happen during Auth48. I will re-read S5.10 and re-create my thinking before suggesting any text to you. Regardless, any text suggestions will be cosmetic in nature and not modify the underlying mechanism, so I will trust your judgment in deciding whether or not to put these in. I will attempt to get the text to you as expeditiously as possible. Thank you for your attention to my comments, and once again, apologies for not getting back to you in earlier. Ciao. - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org} WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
