Hi Vijay, perfect! I will introduce your text (send it to me when you have it ready) in AUTH48.
Thanks! Gonzalo Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> Hi Vijay, >> >> thanks for the comments. Answers inline: > > Gonzalo: Picking up the threads of this review (my sincere > apologies for not getting back to you earlier)... > > For the record, all of my comments have been addressed, so I have > no additional ones. One remaining feedback from you was: > > vkg> - S5.10, third and fourth paragraphs: I think you need to make it > vkg> more explicit that when using registrations as a mechanism to > vkg> inject a recipient URI into a relay, the only way to do so is > vkg> through 3rd-party registrations. Thus, we have to ensure that > vkg> 3rd party registrations are valid through the return routability > vkg> gyrations shown in Figure 7 (i.e., sending a MESSAGE to the > vkg> URI in the Contact header of an incoming REGISTER, etc.) If you > vkg> don't make explain the reason for this 3rd-party registration step > vkg> in some detail, the nuances on why this is done is perhaps lost > vkg> on the reader. > gonzalo> > gonzalo> Could you propose text to make it more explicit? I have read > gonzalo> so many times this draft that it looks perfectly explicit > gonzalo> to me :o) > > That is fair. I do note that IESG just approved consent-framework-04; > so any further changes will happen during Auth48. I will re-read > S5.10 and re-create my thinking before suggesting any text to you. > Regardless, any text suggestions will be cosmetic in nature and > not modify the underlying mechanism, so I will trust your judgment > in deciding whether or not to put these in. I will attempt to > get the text to you as expeditiously as possible. > > Thank you for your attention to my comments, and once again, > apologies for not getting back to you in earlier. > > Ciao. > > - vijay _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
