Kathleen,
Just a few remaining comments:
> Each of the three listed classes may be the only class included in
> the RID class, hence the option for zero or one.
Ah, it means zero or one *occurrences*, that wasn't obvious to me.
BTW is 'RID class' what you mean rather than 'RID extension'?
> 6.3 Authentication of RID Protocol
I'm still a little puzzled by the mention of WS-Security.
That is such an enormous beast that I don't see how you
can refer to it in passing without any details.
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didn't you need to update that?
Thanks
Brian
On 2008-02-21 03:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
> I went through your comments and made the necessary changes to the RID
> document yesterday. I submitted the new version last night.
>
> I am attaching the edited txt document you sent with comments. Please let
> me know if there are other adjustments that should be made or if I did not
> address your comments adequately.
>
> Thank you,
> Kathleen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: Moriarty, Kathleen
> Cc: Tim Polk
> Subject: [Fwd: Gen-ART LC review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-02.txt]
>
> Kathleen, comments will tend to go to the address in
> the draft ;-)
>
> Please cc any reply to [email protected]
>
> Thanks
>
> Brian
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-02.txt
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:29:08 +1300
> From: Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: University of Auckland
> To: General Area Review Team <[email protected]>
> CC: Tim Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
