Good morning Brian, Thank you. I will make the updates later today. I had changed my contact information in the version 3 that was really just a contact update, but I went back to my original document for version 4 and must have overlooked that change.
As for the WS-security, should I leave that reference out then? The draft is long enough as it is, so I am not sure I want to expand it further. Or should I state the discussion is out of scope for the document? Yes, it is more accurate to say RID class. We went through many revisions and it was an extension at one point in time. I'll comb through the document again for that as well and correct where needed. Thank you, Kathleen -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:47 PM To: Moriarty, Kathleen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Gen-ART LC review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-02.txt] Kathleen, Just a few remaining comments: > Each of the three listed classes may be the only class included in > the RID class, hence the option for zero or one. Ah, it means zero or one *occurrences*, that wasn't obvious to me. BTW is 'RID class' what you mean rather than 'RID extension'? > 6.3 Authentication of RID Protocol I'm still a little puzzled by the mention of WS-Security. That is such an enormous beast that I don't see how you can refer to it in passing without any details. > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Didn't you need to update that? Thanks Brian On 2008-02-21 03:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello Brian, > > I went through your comments and made the necessary changes to the RID > document yesterday. I submitted the new version last night. > > I am attaching the edited txt document you sent with comments. Please let > me know if there are other adjustments that should be made or if I did not > address your comments adequately. > > Thank you, > Kathleen > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:02 PM > To: Moriarty, Kathleen > Cc: Tim Polk > Subject: [Fwd: Gen-ART LC review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-02.txt] > > Kathleen, comments will tend to go to the address in > the draft ;-) > > Please cc any reply to [email protected] > > Thanks > > Brian > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-02.txt > Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:29:08 +1300 > From: Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: University of Auckland > To: General Area Review Team <[email protected]> > CC: Tim Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
