I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-02.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 2008-03-25
IETF LC End Date: 2008-03-26
Summary: The document is ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC.
Comments:
- Section 2.2. The document mentions an expired Internet-Draft without a
reference. Since this is not critical for the document, and since this
document is going to be published as an RFC, I would suggest to delete
the draft name, perhaps even the second complete sentence.
- Section 3, 7th paragraph says:
The
receiver must always store a valid received Opaque LSA in its link-
state database. The receiver must not accept Opaque LSAs that
violate the flooding scope (e.g., a type-11 (domain-wide) Opaque LSA
I think the "must" and "must not" should be normative (capitalized).
- References [OSPF-MT] and [OSPFv3] do not list the version number of
the draft. Actually, OSPF-MT has been published as RFC 4915.
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Siemens Networks Espoo, Finland
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
