Yuji -
To address your comment, I propose to add a new parragraph below in
this section (after 4st paragraph). I think your question was if this
requirement has benefit or not, so I'm trying to clarify that.
" This policy will benefit customers. Some customers would like to
detect failure soon at CE side and restore full connectivity by
switching over to their backup line, rather than to keep poor half
connectivity (i.e., either unicast or multicast being in fail). Even
if either unicast or multicast is kept alive, it is just
disadvantageous to the customer's application protocols which need
both traffic. Fate-sharing policy contributes to preventing such a
complicated situation."
Yes, this is great. If you add this text to the document, it will be
more clear to the reader why you enforce fate sharing.
Thanks!
- Christian
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
