Christian, Thanks for your reply. I'll reflect them in the next revision.
Yuji > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:54 PM > To: Yuji KAMITE > Cc: 'Gen-ART Mailing List'; 'Jari Arkko'; 'Mark Townsley'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'yuichiro wada'; 'Ron Bonica'; > 'Russ Housley'; 'Tim Polk' > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-05 > > Yuji - > > > To address your comment, I propose to add a new parragraph > below in > > this section (after 4st paragraph). I think your question > was if this > > requirement has benefit or not, so I'm trying to clarify that. > > > > " This policy will benefit customers. Some customers > would like to > > detect failure soon at CE side and restore full connectivity by > > switching over to their backup line, rather than to keep poor half > > connectivity (i.e., either unicast or multicast being in > fail). Even > > if either unicast or multicast is kept alive, it is just > > disadvantageous to the customer's application protocols which need > > both traffic. Fate-sharing policy contributes to preventing such a > > complicated situation." > > Yes, this is great. If you add this text to the document, it > will be more clear to the reader why you enforce fate sharing. > > Thanks! > > - Christian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Vogt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:51 PM > To: Yuji KAMITE > Cc: 'Gen-ART Mailing List'; 'Jari Arkko'; 'Mark Townsley'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'yuichiro wada' > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-05 > > Hi Yuji, > > thanks for addressing my comments on your document. I like > the changes you are suggesting. These settle the > questions/concerns I had. > > Regarding your clarifications on fate sharing: Do you think > you could add these thoughts to the document, perhaps as an > introductory paragraph to the fate sharing section? > > - Christian > > > > On Jul 22, 2008, Yuji KAMITE wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > I'm planning changes based on your Gen-ART Reviews (attached email). > > See my response in [YK] part written below and please tell > me if it is > > OK. > > > > Regarding your 3rd comment (about section 5.10), please > > see my clarification about it (see below). And then I'd > like to hear > > your thoughts more. > > > > Best regards, > > Yuji > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
