James, Gonzalo and Subha,
I agree with Cullen and the comments made by Suresh as well. Can one
of you do a quick update?
While you are at it, please consider those additional comments for
the normative reference section:
- RFC 5234 has obsoleted 4234,
- if you have SDP + offer/answer as normative references, do you
really need 3261? I don't think you do.
Jean-Francois.
MMUSIC co-chair.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:28 PM
> To: Suresh Krishnan
> Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mmusic-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-
> identification-01.txt
>
>
> Folks, what Suresh is saying makes since to me. If other folks
> agree,
> can you update the draft to resolve these and the sec-dir review
> comments and submit a new version of the draft.
>
> Thanks, Cullen
>
> On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
> > draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-identification-01.txt
> >
> > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
> >
> > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
> comments
> > you may receive.
> >
> > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed
> > Standard, but I have a suggestion.
> >
> > Downref
> > =======
> >
> > * I feel that the downward reference to RFC4080 is not necessary
> at
> > all. (more details below)
> >
> > IANA considerations
> > ===================
> >
> > * Section 6.3 : Since this document is creating the registry and
> > assigning the initial values, THIS document (and its eventual
> RFC)
> > needs to be the reference and NOT the rsvp or nsis RFCs. So this
> > registry would read
> >
> >
> > QoS Mechanism Reference
> > ---------------------------- ---------
> > rsvp RFC XXXX
> > nsis RFC XXXX
> >
> > Given this RFC 2205 and 4080 can be moved to the informational
> > references section.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Suresh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
