Hi Jean Francois,
I have submitted a new version of the draft that addresses all comments
(Sec and Gen-ART reviews) received.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-identification-02.txt
Cheers,
Gonzalo
Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi,
yes, I will put together a new revision of the draft addressing both the
Gen-ART and the Sec reviews as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
Jean-Francois Mule wrote:
James, Gonzalo and Subha,
I agree with Cullen and the comments made by Suresh as well. Can one
of you do a quick update?
While you are at it, please consider those additional comments for
the normative reference section:
- RFC 5234 has obsoleted 4234,
- if you have SDP + offer/answer as normative references, do you
really need 3261? I don't think you do.
Jean-Francois.
MMUSIC co-chair.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:28 PM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mmusic-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-
identification-01.txt
Folks, what Suresh is saying makes since to me. If other folks
agree,
can you update the draft to resolve these and the sec-dir review
comments and submit a new version of the draft.
Thanks, Cullen
On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-mmusic-qos-identification-01.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
comments
you may receive.
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed
Standard, but I have a suggestion.
Downref
=======
* I feel that the downward reference to RFC4080 is not necessary
at
all. (more details below)
IANA considerations
===================
* Section 6.3 : Since this document is creating the registry and
assigning the initial values, THIS document (and its eventual
RFC)
needs to be the reference and NOT the rsvp or nsis RFCs. So this
registry would read
QoS Mechanism Reference
---------------------------- ---------
rsvp RFC XXXX
nsis RFC XXXX
Given this RFC 2205 and 4080 can be moved to the informational
references section.
Cheers
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
