Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Summary: This draft is well written, easy to understand and ready for > publication as BCP, but I have a few comments of an editorial nature. > > Section 2.1.2 Paragraph 3 > ========================== > > * s/mechaism /mechanism/
Fixed, thanks. > Section 2.1.3 > ============= > > * s/interoperatibility/interoperability/ Fixed, thanks. > Section B.6 > =========== > * Replace non existent reference [8] with a reference to RFC3629 (At > least I think that was what the authors intended) The reference to [8] is in a verbatim quote from another document. I think it should be OK to leave it as-is. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
