Martin:
I noticed that the validator gave a bunch of errors, but I checked them
and they were related to the XML Schema (mostly in OpenGML schemas), not
to the examples you provided. I am not sure if this is the same issue you
are referring to.
/Miguel
Thomson, Martin wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the review. I will rev the document today or tomorrow and address
all your comments.
Regarding the examples, they are all being changed in the revision. Unfortunately, all of the
parseContents="lax" directives cause the validator to stop checking. We missed the same errors
[1]. I now use schema documents with all instances of "lax" replaced with "strict" for
validation. That method is better able to find errors than using the straightforward method.
Maybe there is a lesson to be learned there...
WGS84 is an acronym that is so well known in the location business that I guess
we (wrongly) assumed that it would make sense. This is the coordinate system
used by the GPS system, and many other mapping and location systems. It
defines what latitude and longitude really mean.
Regards,
Martin
[1] The errors: the method element should be qualified with "gp:" and the timestamp
element needed to be qualified with "dm:" and moved after the dm:device element.
-----Original Message-----
From: Miguel A. Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 24 November 2008 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; geopriv-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: General Area Review Team
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-13.txt
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-13.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 2008-11-24
IETF LC End Date: 2008-11-30
Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track
RFC.
Comments:
- I have taken the effort of validating all the XML examples included
in
the draft. I used the Xerces validator available at
http://validate.openlaboratory.net/. I find awkward to include 39 XML
Schema files (thanks to the OpenGML explosion of schema files), but
that
doesn't seem to be a problem (other than for humans). Other than that,
the examples all validate.
- The short name of the draft (which is printed as a heading in every
page) is set to "GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Profile". I think it should be set to
"GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Usage", since neither the title nor the text refer to
the document as a profile.
- Section 1, first paragraph, add an informative reference to GMLv3
when
it is mentioned in the text.
- Section 2, 5th paragraph, expand "LIS" and "LCP".
- Section 5, the first paragraph on page 15. What is a "WGS84 CRS"? Is
this something where an informative reference could be added?
/Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
