Dear Spencer, Thank you again for your review.
Best regards, Badra On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Spencer Dawkins <[email protected]>wrote: > Just to let people know - version 07 also looks fine to me ("ready for > publication as a Proposed Standard"). > > Thanks, > > Spencer > > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for >> this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-netconf-tls-06.txt >> Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins >> Review Date: 2009-02-09 >> IETF LC End Date: 2009-02-19 >> IESG Telechat date: (not known) >> >> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. >> >> Major issues: none noted >> >> Minor issues: none noted >> >> Nits/editorial comments: one noted (as follows) >> >> 2.2. Connection Closure >> >> A TLS client (NETCONF manager) MUST close the associated TLS >> connection if the connection is not expected to issues any NETCONF >> >> Spencer (nit): s/issues/issue/ >> >> RPC commands later. It MUST send a TLS close_notify alert before >> closing the connection. The TLS client MAY choose to not wait for >> the TLS server (NETCONF agent) close_notify alert and simply close >> the connection, thus generating an incomplete close on the TLS server >> side. Once the TLS server gets a close_notify from the TLS client, >> it MUST reply with a close_notify unless it becomes aware that the >> connection has already been closed by the TLS client (e.g., the >> closure was indicated by TCP). >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
