I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-07.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2009-05-05
IETF LC End Date: 2009-05-11
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:  Ready
--------

Comments: 
--------- 

Apart from the small point mentioned below, I didn't find any technical
issues with this draft, but it left me feeling a little uncomfortable. It isn't
a standard, it isn't an experiment, it isn't a description of current practice,
so what is it?


Minor issues: 
-------------

Referring to section 5.1.2, note that in RFC5364, 
"sip:[email protected]"
is a MUST rather than a SHOULD. I don't know whether that interacts with the
current draft in any way.


Editorial issues:
-----------------

== Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of
     draft-ietf-behave-turn-13
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to