Francis Dupont wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Francis: Thank you for your review of the draft. More inline.
Nits/editorial comments:
(I apologize to have been late to send this review)
- 1.2 page 3: X.680 [5],X.690 [6]. -> X.680 [5], X.690 [6].
Thanks, will fix with any other comments from IETF LC.
- 3 page 4:
the application need not recognize -> needs???
(BTW the spelling error, if it is an error, is in RFC 5280)
I believe that in this context, "need" is grammatically
correct -- "needs not recognize..." does not seem to read very
well.
PS: I don't comment about the EKU idea, I've seen some PKI experts in
Acknowledgments so I expect you do the right thing.
Yes; the draft was socialized extensively with PKIX WG. We
even had a WG meeting slot to present the work and solicit
face-to-face comments from PKIX during the formation of the
work. The LC in SIP also was CC'd to the PKIX WG and
comments solicited from that as well.
Thank you.
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
