In your previous mail you wrote: > - 3 page 4: > the application need not recognize -> needs??? > (BTW the spelling error, if it is an error, is in RFC 5280) I believe that in this context, "need" is grammatically correct -- "needs not recognize..." does not seem to read very well. => there are in fact two questions: - is need the verb and the application the subject, in this case this seems to be a spelling error - in a quote should a spelling error be fixed? IMHO it should not. So I put some '?' to mark I have no strong opinion about this.
> PS: I don't comment about the EKU idea, I've seen some PKI experts in > Acknowledgments so I expect you do the right thing. Yes; the draft was socialized extensively with PKIX WG. We even had a WG meeting slot to present the work and solicit face-to-face comments from PKIX during the formation of the work. The LC in SIP also was CC'd to the PKIX WG and comments solicited from that as well. => I missed most of last PKIX WG meetings (I can't be at two places at the same time :-) but I know who are the leaders in this WG (and the mixed opinion about EKUs in the community). BTW it is a typical LC item (it should be hard to find a more typical thing :-). Thanks [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
