I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-bfd-05
Reviewer: Avshalom Houri
Review Date: 2009-07-02
IETF LC End Date: 2009-07-02
IESG Telechat date: (if known) --
Summary: The document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
Line 480
This precedence order prioritizes superset of functionality and
simplicity of encapsulation.
- Hard to understand what the sentence means.
Nits/editorial comments:
line 259:
the scope of this specification, and is instead defined in
- Word "instead" is probably redundant.
Line 287:
within the rage 49152 through 65535. The IP Protocol Number and
- rage -> range
Line 378
see Table 1 in in Section 3.
- in in -> in
Line 440
continue using it until such time as the PW is re-signaled. In
- Probably should be:
continue using it until when the PW is re-signaled. In
Line 466
the order lowest list number CV Type to highest list number CV Type,
- Should be:
the order of the lowest list number CV Type to the highest list number
CV Type,
--Avshalom
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
