A new version addressing all issues raised during IESG last call has
been posted. In fact, only Francis had some minor comments.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm-09.txt

Best regards,
Katrin



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 4:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: review of draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm-08.txt
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-hokey-key-mgm-08.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 2009-07-30
> IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-03
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
>  I understand this specification is very abstract about on wire
entities
> (for instance there is nothing about encoding, etc) but this can
become
> an issue about key labels, i.e., the reader has to read the
(referenced)
> RFC 5295 if (s)he wants to know what are exactly these key labels
> (note the term "label" can denote many different things).
> I suggest to be lightly more reader friendly, for instance by writing
> the RFC 5295 establishes a IANA registry for "USRK Key Labels" too:
> for the specification of key labels -> ... and associated IANA
registry.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
>  [Usual RFC Editor style stuff]
> 
>  - ToC page 3 and 8 page 11: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
> 
>  - 1 page 4 and 6.1 page 10: e.g. -> e.g.,
> 
>  - 1 page 4, 2 page 5, 4 page 7 and 6.1 page 10: i.e. -> i.e.,
> 
>  - 6.2 pages 10 and 11: (suggestion) a RK -> an RK
> 
>  - I give up about: handover -> hand-over
> 
>  - 4 page 7 and 4.2 page 9: (suggestion) roundtrip -> round-trip
> 
> Regards
> 
> [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to