Francis,
Much thanks for the comments. See below for a single response.
On 9/7/2009 8:31 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
> (Oops, it seems I forgot to forward this)
>
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 2009-08-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-31
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Major issues: none
>
> Minor issues: none
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - ToC page 2 and 8 page 12: Author's Addresses -> Authors' Addresses
>
> - 1 page 3: i.e. -> i.e.,
>
> - 2.1 page 4: please introduce the ERO (Explict Route Object) abbrev
> (note the TLV abbrev is supposed to be common so doesn't need to be
> introduced, cf
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt )
>
> - 2.1 page 5: IF_IF -> IF_ID
>
> - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant
Why?
>
> - 2.2 page 6: Re-routing -> re-routing
>
> - 2.2 page 6: is note -> is not
>
> Note: the usage of rerouting/re-routing is not very uniform...
>
good, catch.
Much thanks,
Lou
> Regards (and sorry for the delay)
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
