okay, reasonable enough.  While it is jargon, I think it is accepted in
the computer science space...

Thanks,
Lou

On 9/29/2009 6:10 PM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
> => oops, catching an old message.
>    
>    >  - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant
>    
>    Why?
>    
> => just because conformant is not in my dictionary, compliant is
> and is supposed to mean the same thing... Now my dictionary is
> not universal and is British oriented (:-).
> 
> Regards
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to