So it is only my misunderstanding. Maybe it will be good to note that in 
the document.

--Avshalom






From:
Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]>
To:
Avshalom Houri/Haifa/i...@ibmil, General Area Review Team 
<[email protected]>
Cc:
Lisa Dusseault <[email protected]>
Date:
03/12/2009 01:53 AM
Subject:
RE: Gen Art LC and TC review of: draft-hammer-oauth-07



The ?c2&a3=2+q? string is used to demonstrate form-encoded entity-body. 
Not sure what you mean by redundant.
 
EHL
 
From: Avshalom Houri [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:35 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; General Area Review Team
Cc: Lisa Dusseault
Subject: Gen Art LC and TC review of: draft-hammer-oauth-07
 
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-hammer-oauth-07
Reviewer: Avshalom Houri
Review Date: 2009-12-01
IESG Telechat date: 2009-12-03

Summary: Version 07 of the document resolves the issue that I have raised 
when reviewing version 03 and is ready for publication as an informational 
RFC. 

Major issues: None 

Minor issues: None 

Nits/editorial comments: 

In lines 887, 936, 1113, 1248: "c2&a3=2+q" seems to be redundant. 

Acknowledgements section is usually not put in the appendix (usually after 
IANA considerations). 

Thanks
--Avshalom
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to