Hi Vijay,

at first thanks for your review.

2009/12/2 Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]>:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-03.txt
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: Dec. 2, 2009
> IETF LC End Date: ??
> IESG Telechat date: Dec 3, 2009
>
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Informational;
>
> I reviewed it as a generalist and found 0 major issues, 0
> minor issues, and 3 nits.
>
> Nits:
> 1) You may want to expand SEND before first use in Section 2;
>  you do so later on (below Figure 1), but should move that
>  up.

OK. Fixed in the next version of the draft.

>
> 2) S2.3, below Figure 3: The text says that
>  "An alternative (alluded to in an appendix of ND Proxy)..."
>
>  You may want to provide a reference to the document containing
>  this appendix.

OK. Fixed in the next version of the draft.

>
> 3) S3.3: s/options) [RFC4389]/options) [RFC4389].

OK. Fixed in the next version of the draft.

>
>  (note the missing period above.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>

Thanks again for your review.

Best regards.

JMC.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to