(Copying the gen-art list to put this on record)

The changes in your proto-25 version look good to me.
Thanks!

I will probably be asked to review this again formally
when it gets to the IESG agenda. I don't foresee any
further issues.

    Brian

On 2009-12-21 18:54, Anthony Bryan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2009-12-21 11:21, Anthony Bryan wrote:
>>> Brian, thank you for the review & happy holidays. :)
>>>
>>> The latest revision (-25, unsubmitted) contains changes due to
>>> comments during last call:
>>> http://metalinks.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metalinks/internetdraft/
>>>
>>> We use "trust200902" in it. Does that resolve this issue?
>> That will work for me!
>>
>>>> Minor issues:
>>>> -------------
>>>>
>>>> This is a bit picky, but section 4.1.2 contains a series of rules like
>>>> this one:
>>>>
>>>>    o  metalink:file elements MAY contain exactly one metalink:copyright
>>>>       element.
>>>>
>>>> Note that (if parsed rigorously according to RFC2119) this does not forbid 
>>>> an
>>>> element that contains more than one metalink:copyright element. To be 
>>>> rigorous,
>>>> you'd have to add "and MUST NOT contain more than one such element". I'm 
>>>> not sure
>>>> if you want to go there...
>>> Let's be rigorous. I'll make those changes.
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't we want to go there?
>> Oh, only because it would make the text a bit noisy. But it should prevent
>> misunderstandings down the road.
> 
> I looked at Atom, which my draft follows quite a bit, & it uses this
> phrasing for similar elements
> 
> "atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:icon element."
> 
> Which phrasing is preferable? I guess it is less ambiguous if you're
> told what you MAY and MUST NOT do, as opposed to just what MUST NOT be
> done?
> 
> If possible, could you verify that I made the changes correctly? It
> would be appreciated. There were some spots in 4.1.1 and 4.1.2
> 
> http://metalinks.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metalinks/internetdraft/
> 
> Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to