On 2/1/10 23:21, Feb 1, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Meta
====
* How does the mechanism in the draft relate to say an atom or an RSS feed? When would one use the sip subscribe mechanism instead of atom and vice versa? Perhaps it is out of scope of this document, but I was just curious.

My understanding is that Atom is pretty much a syndication syntax, and that Atom clients perform periodic HTTP polling to determine when the state of the Atom feed has changed. At least, this model is consistent with my experience as a user of Atom syndication readers.

This mechanism would actually dovetail into such a system by allowing readers to re-poll the Atom resource only when it has changed, instead of on a time-based periodic basis.

But, then again, I'm not well versed in Atom, and may have missed some mechanism that makes periodic polling unnecessary (such as long-polling techniques).

Minor
=====

* Section 3.2

The example using two URLs each in www.example.com and www.example.org is too complex. I do not see the value in adding the www.example.org URLs. Are these necessary?

The goal of the example was to show that a user can be interested in a set of URLs that resolve to two different monitor-groups, and show how the client would respond (by forming two different subscriptions). I admit that RFC formatting makes the resulting text a bit unsightly, but I think it provides significant value beyond a simple one-domain example.

* Section 3.3

This section is very interesting and useful. Why does it need to be removed?

I'm happy to leave it in. It was mostly there because of the broad range of audience I anticipated reviewing the draft -- in most other cases, the rationale would go on the mailing list and not the i-d itself. But there's no harm in including it; it's just not something that one typically sees in RFCs (although I do know that exceptions exist).

I'll remove the RFC editor note.

Typo
====

* Section 4.7

s/supress/suppress/

Argh. That was one of the small changes I made after the most recent round of spell-checking. Thanks for catching it.

/a
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to