I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-prefix-00.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2010-02-27
IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-11
Summary: Ready, but two questions
--------
Major issues:
-------------
This is marked as Informational. The shepherd's writeup says
"There is general consensus within the working group that the fields
this document standardizes are necessary."
Is it a standard or isn't it?
Question
--------
Without reading a couple of other documents, I can't determine whether there
are any character set restrictions on the new HNP field.
I ask because I happen to live at 1C/9 Something Road (that is the standard
typography here in NZ for subdivided properties). Is such a syntax allowed
by HNP?
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
