On 2010-03-06 11:29, Brian Rosen wrote: > The draft merely adds a field to a registry that requires specification > required and expert review. I think Informational is acceptable, but will > defer to chairs for concurrence.
OK, then it is only a slip in the writeup. > > The only restriction on content is in RFC4776 which states: > Component values MUST be encoded as UTF-8 [7]. They SHOULD be > written in mixed case, following the customary spelling. The script > indication (CAtype 128) MUST be written in mixed case, with the first > letter a capital letter. > > While some fields are limited in some way, that is a special case, and is > noted in the field description. In these fields, there is no restriction, > and punctuation may be common. Good, thanks. Russ: IMHO this is a no objection. Brian C > > Brian > > > On 3/5/10 2:50 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
