I will fix the nits as you suggest. We have quite a bit of experience in the U.S. with what kind of GPS accuracy we can get. There are millions of phones and tens of thousands of calls annually using GPS positioning. It is quite difficult to achieve a 100 meter accuracy 95% of the time. Technology is improving all the time, but at the moment, carriers are struggling to achieve the regulatory mandate for 100 meter uncertainty, 95% confidence.
WGS84 is the most commonly used international datum. IETF emergency calling is based on IETF geopriv standards (see RFC4119), which specifies WGS-84. Brian On 3/8/10 10:44 AM, "Francis Dupont" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-10.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 2010-03-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2010-03-10 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Almost Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: the Terminology is incomplete (no PSAP for instance) > and the GPS stuff seems a bit USA centric (IMHO you should show > the document to a GPS (or Galileo :-) expert). > > Nits/editorial comments: > - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 1 page 3: add USA to National (if the NENA is a USA organization :-) > > - 1 page 3: I'd *really* like to get an entry for PSAP here! > > - 1 page 3: IMHO there should be an entry for LoST too. > > - 1 page 4: RoutinglLocation -> Routing Location > > - 2 page 5: e.g. -> e.g., > > - 2 page 5: expand EV-DO? > > - 3 page 10: AliceE -> Alice > > - 3 page 10: missing [M7] and [M8] > > - 3 page 10: floating "Figure 2" without a figure (from the .txt version) > > - 3 page 10 (in ESRP entry): sip -> SIP > > - 3 page 10: e.g. -> e.g., > > - 6 page 15: I don't know the quality of GPS in mobile phone, I have > a GPS receiver for pedestrian (surely best conditions: open-sky, > low speed), its accuracy is between 4 and 15 m (displayed) and > <10m at 95% (vendor specs in peace time) without WAAS (I use it > in France) so your numbers are a bit conservative. > > - 6.1 page 16: WGS 84 could (should :-) be replaced by another > system and as far as I know it is not the system used in Europe > (I don't know for ASIA). > > - 6.2 page 17: e.g. -> e.g., > > - 6.5 page 20: requestor -> requester? > > - 6.8 page 23: UAC -> UA (typo? if not the abbrev should be expanded) > > - 6.10 page 25: United States -> United States of America > (yes, there are more than one United States :-) > > - 7 page 26: IMHO you should add a reference for LoST > > - 8 page 27: AP -> access point > > - 9.1 page 28: xref problem (missing '<' in XML?) > > - 9.1 page 28: IPSEC -> IPsec > > - 10 page 30: please define AoR abbrev at its first use. > > - 12 page 30: i.e -> i.e., > > - 15 page 31: some missing text before "includes a description" > > - 18 page 32: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - Authors' Addresses pages 36 and 37: US -> USA > > Regards > > [email protected] > > PS: you have some comments from Cullen Jennings too. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
