as a co-author, I understand the concerns raised by Brian and I agree with Peter's proposals to address them

We can clarify that the goal of this draft is not to endorse the long-polling techniques (but rather to present the known issues and the counter-measures that try to mitigate these issues)

I do think we should not go further and add a judgemental statement along the line of Brian's comment ("This is real example of protocol abuse. HTTP wasn't designed for this and doesn't do this properly")

but I think that we can more neutrally add a sentence stating that the proposed techniques stretch the original semantic of HTTP and that the HTTP protocol was not designed for this use... which is a fact rather than a judgement.

Stefano

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 12/3/10 8:44 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <[email protected]> wrote:

This is real example of protocol abuse. HTTP wasn't designed for
this and doesn't do this properly.

Which is why folks who are currently using long-polling techniques are
actively contributing to the HYBI WG.

The draft is non-judgmental,
and that might be a mistake.

The draft is Informational and therefore isn't really in a position to pass
judgments. All it is trying to say is: we know that long-polling techniques
have many issues, but if you're going to use these techniques then at least
try to do so with some modicum of intelligence. We're making the best of a
bad situation, and if the HYBI WG is successful then hopefully people won't
feel the need for long-polling techniques in the future.

Personally, if I was in the IESG,
I'd be considering a "holding my nose" ABSTAIN ballot

I'll be balloting RECUSE.

unless some text stating that the methods described are really bad ideas
was added.

I'd have no problem with adding a sentence or two to the effect that
long-polling is a temporary hack that emerged from the applications
community and will hopefully be superseded by technologies that aren't so
abusive of HTTP. I'll confer with my co-authors about wordsmithing, if they
agree that it's a good idea to add such text.

Peter





--
*******************************************************************
Stefano Salsano
Dipartimento Ingegneria Elettronica
Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Via del Politecnico, 1 - 00133 Roma - ITALY

http://netgroup.uniroma2.it/Stefano_Salsano/

E-mail  : [email protected]
Cell.   : +39 320 4307310
Office  : (Tel.) +39 06 72597770  (Fax.) +39 06 72597435
*******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to